Accelerating Adoption of Medical Evidence into Clinical Practice

Linda Peitzman
Written by Linda Peitzman
on April 13, 2015

Patients expect doctors to hold themselves to the highest standards, including an expectation that the care they provide is based upon the latest medical evidence and best practices. But while doctors work diligently to stay current with all of the changes in medicine, it is a nearly impossible task. The volume of clinical information is estimated to double every 3-5 years—while a physician’s capacity to recall and organize relevant medical information remains static. Read further >


Making Current Awareness for Professionals Actionable

John Barker
Written by John Barker
on April 03, 2015

I like Wolters Kluwer Health’s UpToDate‘s model of current awareness. Subject-matter experts in healthcare monitor articles in medical journals and results of clinical trials and incorporate into the evidence-based clinical decision support guidelines within UpToDate so that medical professionals’ decisions are truly up to date. Instead of merely presenting the most recent journal articles for reading – and there are hundreds of thousands every year – UpToDate presents a “comprehensive synthesis of the evidence.” In summary, UpToDate makes health and medical current awareness actionable. In my opinion, UpToDate is an inspirational model for current awareness for lawyers, accountants and compliance professionals. So how might UpToDate’s model of presenting practice-changing updates manifest in the tax, legal & regulatory space? Here are some examples: Read further >


Patient-Centric Decision Support to Battle Sepsis

Stephen Claypool
Written by Stephen Claypool
on March 23, 2015

Every doctor worries about missing a diagnosis that leads to a patient’s death. Even more upsetting is the knowledge that the data needed to save that life was in the patient’s record, but just out of the doctor’s reach. Such is usually the case with sepsis—the body’s often-fatal immune response to infection that can escalate rapidly and lead to organ failure and septic shock. Read further >


Genetic Test Results – LOINC to the rescue?

Howard Strasberg MD MS
Written by Howard Strasberg MD MS
on March 20, 2015

Personalized medicine holds the promise of tailoring treatments to individual patient traits. In addition to traditional characteristics such as age, gender, kidney function and liver function, it’s now becoming possible to tailor drug therapy to a patient’s genome. For additional background, please see my 2012 and 2014 posts on this subject. Read further >


Improving Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care

Howard Strasberg MD MS
Written by Howard Strasberg MD MS
on February 16, 2015

Primary care providers frequently prescribe antibiotics for conditions such as acute otitis media (AOM), acute bronchitis and possible or suspected pnemonia. In many cases, the use of antibiotics is not supported by the evidence, thereby exacerbating the problem of antibiotic resistance and putting patients at risk of adverse drug events. Read further >


Lawyers Can Learn from Knowledge Management in Healthcare

John Barker
Written by John Barker
on February 06, 2015

I observe similar trends in knowledge management tools for healthcare and legal professionals. Both doctors and lawyers must increase productivity in the face of ever more challenging patient/client demands. They don’t have time for a lot of reading and research. So knowledge management for both must focus on providing practical synoptic content. In my opinion, several healthcare knowledge management (KM) tools that provide evidence-based clinical decision support to providers can serve as inspiration for legal KM. Read further >


Could the President’s Data Breach Proposal Affect Health Care?

Law and Health Blog
Written by Law and Health Blog
on January 23, 2015

Sony. Target. Home Depot. Community Health. Data breaches have Americans scared. The Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC) reported 783 data breaches in 2014, an increase of 27.5 percent as compared to 2013; 42 percent of those breaches occurred in the Medical/Health Care industry. On January 12, 2015, President Obama announced a legislative proposal he referred to as the Personal Data Notification & Protection Act. The Act would create a single national standard that companies would follow to notify consumers within 30 days of a breach. The President is expected to expand upon this proposal in his upcoming State of the Union speech. Read further >


Clinical Quality Language

Howard Strasberg MD MS
Written by Howard Strasberg MD MS
on January 12, 2015

HL7 is currently balloting a draft standard for a new language to represent clinical quality and clinical decision support expressions. This new language is called Clinical Quality Language (CQL). For decades, hospital systems have used different languages to represent medical knowledge, making it difficult to author decision support applications that can be used across institutions. This problem has been previously addressed through other standards such as the Arden Syntax and GELLO, but Arden is supported only by a limited number of electronic medical record (EMR) vendors, and GELLO implementations are few and far between. The new CQL standard allows the authoring of logic for both clinical quality measurement (CQM) and clinical decision support (CDS) use cases. In addition to a human-readable form (CQL), it provides a machine-friendly representation in XML using something called the Expression Logical Model (ELM). Read further >


Quality of C-CDA documents

Howard Strasberg MD MS
Written by Howard Strasberg MD MS
on December 22, 2014

Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) documents are being used in the United States to exchange patient data between providers. In the current issue of JAMIA, the authors D’Amore, Mandel, Kreda, et al, evaluated the quality of a sample of these documents. They conducted a detailed review of 21 C-CDA samples received from different vendors. Read further >


Highlight on California: Courts Side with Providers in Golden State Data Breaches, For Now

Law and Health Blog
Written by Law and Health Blog
on December 08, 2014

Two recent cases decided by two California appellate courts shed some light on what one source describes as “judicial reluctance” to award damages to individuals whose information was potentially leaked in a security breach. At least this was the result in these matters where the plaintiffs could not prove anything beyond minimal harm stemming from the breaches. Considering these decisions as well as the sharp increase of reports of breaches of security information in California and across the country, the question is raised, to what extent will these precedents be followed in other jurisdictions? Moreover, will the results change if the plaintiffs are able to prove more than minimal harm and what does that entail? Read further >


Exploring trends, content, technology, and new ideas in the global information industry. New posts every Monday, Friday, and whenever the innovation bug inspires us. Visit www.wolterskluwer.com to learn all about us.
Recent comments
dropdown